Jenkins vs CodePipeline: Which CI/CD tool is the winner?
As more and more companies adopt DevOps practices, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to choose the right Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) tool. Two of the most popular are Jenkins and AWS CodePipeline. In this blog post, we’ll compare the two tools based on their features, ease of use, integration, and pricing.
Features
Both Jenkins and CodePipeline have several features that make them popular among DevOps teams. Jenkins offers over 1,000 plugins, which means it can support almost every technology stack. Additionally, Jenkins allows users to create jobs using a graphical user interface (GUI) or build them with code. This level of flexibility allows users to customize their workflows as they see fit.
On the other hand, AWS CodePipeline offers built-in integrations with Amazon Web Services (AWS) services such as CodeCommit, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy. It also offers pre-built pipelines, making it easier for users to get started quickly. While CodePipeline doesn't have as many plugins as Jenkins, it offers support for most of the popular technologies.
Winner: Tie - Both Jenkins and CodePipeline offer a wide range of features.
Ease of Use
Ease of use is crucial when it comes to choosing a CI/CD tool. Jenkins requires some technical knowledge to set up and maintain, and users must install plugins and manage their own servers. This can be time-consuming and may require DevOps teams to have dedicated personnel. While the setup process isn’t overly cumbersome, it can be a barrier for small teams.
AWS CodePipeline, on the other hand, offers a simple web-based console that users can use to set up their pipelines quickly. Since CodePipeline is a fully managed service, AWS handles all server maintenance, updates, and scaling.
Winner: CodePipeline - AWS CodePipeline offers a simpler and more user-friendly interface.
Integration
Integration is critical when choosing a CI/CD tool. Both Jenkins and CodePipeline offer extensive support for third-party tools, and they can be integrated with a wide range of technologies.
Jenkins offers over 1,000 plugins, making it easier for teams to integrate it with their ecosystem. CodePipeline’s integrations are built specifically for AWS, which means it offers a seamless experience if you’re already using AWS services. However, if you’re using non-AWS tools or services, integrations can become a bit more challenging.
Winner: Jenkins - With its extensive plugin ecosystem, Jenkins offers broader integration support.
Pricing
Pricing is an essential consideration for any CI/CD tool, particularly for small companies who must watch their budgets. Jenkins is free and open-source, which makes it an ideal choice for smaller teams that don’t require extensive support.
AWS CodePipeline is a managed service, which means it requires a subscription. AWS offers two pricing plans: Basic and Developer. The Basic plan is free, and users only pay for the AWS services that they use. The Developer plan costs $1 per active pipeline per month, plus the cost of AWS services.
Winner: Jenkins - Jenkins is free and open-source, while CodePipeline requires a subscription.
Conclusion
Determining whether Jenkins or AWS CodePipeline is the better choice depends on your unique needs. Jenkins offers more flexibility, broad integration support, and is free. CodePipeline offers seamless integration with AWS services, is easier to use, and is more suitable for those who prefer a managed service.
Both tools are excellent options, and it ultimately comes down to personal preference. We hope this blog post has given you a better understanding of what each tool offers, making it easier for you to make an informed decision.
References:
- Jenkins. (n.d.). Jenkins. Retrieved August 20, 2021, from https://www.jenkins.io/
- AWS. (n.d.). AWS. Retrieved August 20, 2021, from https://aws.amazon.com/
- CodePipeline. (n.d.). AWS CodePipeline. Retrieved August 20, 2021, from https://aws.amazon.com/codepipeline/